
Direct-to-handset (DTH) satellite service is better off using millimeter wave spectrum than mobile spectrum. The three models prevailing today – spectrum infill, spectrum slice, and over-the-top – have inherent challenges that limit market access (see my previous post). In this post, I share a perspective on how to improve the commercial viability of DTH constellations using mmWave spectrum.
Shortcomings of current models
For DTH constellations to be commercially successful, they need to solve difficult technical challenges while removing barriers to market access that limit the revenue potential. Some of the inherent shortcomings in the current approaches are:
- Spectrum infill: The satellite operator is at the whims of MNOs who, in part, see satellite operators as competitors. Moreover, this approach leads to a complex and costly technical solution. Therefore, this approach is very risky.
- Spectrum slice: Dedicating a slice of spectrum for DTH services implies an opportunity cost: spectrum could be used for more profitable services. This steers the MNOs to allocate small bandwidth leading to low throughput and/or capacity service. The satellite operator is still at the whim of MNOs. Also, both the spectrum infill and slice models are national or regional models: they are limited to agreements with MNOs for specific areas; therefore, they are not global in nature.
- Over-the-top spectrum: This model is proprietary to a single handset manufacturer – Apple. It’s a sound approach for Apple to increase the appeal of new iPhones, but that does not help the wider market. (See here for Apple & Globalstar’s approach.)